Lutz, Sebastian (2011) On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Demarcation Criteria of Science. [Preprint]
Laudan’s argument against the possibility of a demarcation criterion for scientiﬁc theories rests on establishing that any criterion must be a necessary and sufﬁcient condition. But Laudan’s argument at most establishes that any criterion must provide a necessary condition and a possibly different sufﬁcient condition. His own claims suggest that such a criterion is possible.
|Social Networking:|| |
Available Versions of this Item
- On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Demarcation Criteria of Science. (deposited 15 May 2011 11:48)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)