PhilSci Archive

What scientific theories could not be

Halvorson, Hans (2011) What scientific theories could not be. [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
PDF
halvorson-semantic.pdf - Submitted Version

Download (400kB)

Abstract

According to the semantic view of scientific theories, theories are classes of models. I show that this view -- if taken seriously as a formal explication -- leads to absurdities. In particular, this view equates theories that are truly distinct, and it distinguishes theories that are truly equivalent. Furthermore, the semantic view lacks the resources to explicate interesting theoretical relations, such as embeddability of one theory into another. The untenability of the semantic view -- as currently formulated -- threatens to undermine scientific structuralism.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Halvorson, Hanshhalvors@princeton.edu
Keywords: semantic view of theories, received view, constructive empiricism
Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
Depositing User: Hans Halvorson
Date Deposited: 20 May 2011 06:35
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2011 20:03
Item ID: 8615
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8615

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item