PhilSci Archive

On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Criteria for the Demarcation of Science

Lutz, Sebastian (2011) On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Criteria for the Demarcation of Science. [Published Article or Volume]

This is the latest version of this item.

Full text not available from this repository.


Laudan’s argument against the possibility of a demarcation criterion for scientific theories rests on establishing that any criterion must be a necessary and sufficient condition. But Laudan’s argument at most establishes that any criterion must provide a necessary condition and a possibly different sufficient condition. His own claims suggest that such a criterion is possible.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Keywords: demarcation criterion; science; pseudo-science
Subjects: General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
Depositing User: Sebastian Lutz
Date Deposited: 21 Jul 2011 15:08
Last Modified: 21 Jul 2011 15:08
Item ID: 8730
Journal or Publication Title: The Reasoner
Publisher: University of Kent, Center for Reasoning
Official URL:

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item