PhilSci Archive

Auxiliary Assumptions, Unification, and Intelligent Design: A Defense of Contrastive Testability

Lutz, Sebastian (2011) Auxiliary Assumptions, Unification, and Intelligent Design: A Defense of Contrastive Testability. [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
on_boudry_and_leuridan_on_sober.pdf

Download (174kB)

Abstract

Boudry and Leuridan argue that in a number of cases—and specifically in the case of intelligent design—a theory can be intuitively testable, but not contrastively testable according to Sober’s definition. I argue that their purported counterexamples rely on misunderstandings of the concept of contrastive testability and the version of intelligent design criticized by Sober. I also argue that the liberalization of contrastive testability suggested by Boudry and Leuridan is trivial.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Lutz, Sebastiansebastian.lutz@gmx.net
Keywords: testability; contrastive testability; empirical significance; auxiliary assumptions; unification; intelligent design
Subjects: General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience
General Issues > Structure of Theories
General Issues > Theory/Observation
Depositing User: Sebastian Lutz
Date Deposited: 15 Aug 2011 11:26
Last Modified: 15 Aug 2011 11:26
Item ID: 8754
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8754

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item