Weber, Erik and De Vreese, Leen and Van Bouwel, Jeroen (2011) How to Study Scientific Explanation? In: UNSPECIFIED.
This paper investigates the working-method of three important philosophers of explanation: Carl Hempel, Philip Kitcher and Wesley Salmon. We argue that they do three things: (i) construct an explication in the sense of Carnap, which then is used as a tool to make (ii) descriptive and (iii) normative claims about the explanatory practice of scientists. We also show that they did well with respect to (i), but that they failed to give arguments for their descriptive and normative claims. We think it is the responsibility of current philosophers of explanation to go on where Hempel, Kitcher and Salmon failed. However, we should go on in a clever way. We call this clever way the “pragmatic approach to scientific explanation.” We clarify what this approach consists in and defend it.
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)|
|Keywords:||Carnap, explanation, explication, Hempel, Kitcher, Salmon|
|Subjects:||General Issues > Explanation
General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science
General Issues > Philosophers of Science
|Depositing User:||Erik Weber|
|Date Deposited:||01 Sep 2011 11:30|
|Last Modified:||01 Sep 2011 11:30|
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)