Nasmith, Benjamin B (2011) Presentism in a World Denied Instantaneous Signals. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
|PDF - Submitted Version |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (245Kb) | Preview
The special theory of relativity (STR) is widely regarded as the primary threat to the otherwise intuitive presentist worldview. In particular, both the relativity and conventionality of simultaneity within STR appear to undermine presentism and support eternalism. However, these classic arguments merely establish the mutual independence of the relevant concepts of simultaneity. The subsequent debate hinges on whether presentism or eternalism best accounts for the principle of relativity. It is demonstrated that the presentist may obtain the principle of relativity by simply prohibiting instantaneous signals between distant events. Many common objections to the presentist Neo-Lorentzian interpretation of STR are answered in light of this demonstration. Therefore, one is free to choose between presentism and eternalism for some reason other than STR.
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Social Networking:|| |
|Keywords:||Presentism, Special Relativity, Conservation Laws, Conventionality|
|Subjects:||General Issues > Conventionalism|
General Issues > Laws of Nature
Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances
|Depositing User:||Mr. Benjamin Nasmith|
|Date Deposited:||11 Oct 2011 08:31|
|Last Modified:||11 Oct 2011 08:31|
Available Versions of this Item
- Presentism in a World Denied Instantaneous Signals. (deposited 29 Aug 2011 14:10)
- Presentism in a World Denied Instantaneous Signals. (deposited 11 Oct 2011 08:31)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)