PhilSci Archive

What scientific theories could not be

Halvorson, Hans (2011) What scientific theories could not be. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
semantic-defect-revised2.pdf

Download (347kB)

Abstract

According to the semantic view of scientific theories, theories are classes of models. I show that this view -- if taken literally -- leads to absurdities. In particular, this view equates theories that are distinct, and it distinguishes theories that are equivalent. Furthermore, the semantic view lacks the resources to explicate interesting theoretical relations, such as embeddability of one theory into another. The untenability of the semantic view -- as currently formulated -- threatens to undermine scientific structuralism.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Halvorson, Hanshhalvors@princeton.edu
Keywords: semantic view of theories, received view, constructive empiricism
Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
Depositing User: Hans Halvorson
Date Deposited: 11 Dec 2011 20:03
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2011 20:03
Item ID: 8940
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8940

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item