PhilSci Archive

Scientific Representations as Limiting Cases

Ducheyne, Steffen (2012) Scientific Representations as Limiting Cases. [Published Article]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (151Kb) | Preview

    Abstract

    In this essay, I shall show that the so-called inferential (Suárez 2003 and 2004) and interpretational (Contessa 2007) accounts of scientific representation are respectively unsatisfactory and too weak to account for scientific representation (pars destruens). Along the way, I shall also argue that the pragmatic similarity (Giere 2004 and Giere 2010) and the partial isomorphism (da Costa and French 2003 and French 2003) accounts are unable to single out scientific representation. In the pars construens I spell out a limiting case account which has explanatory surplus vis à vis the approaches which I have previously reviewed. My account offers an adequate treatment of scientific representation, or so I shall try to argue. Central to my account is the notion of a pragmatic limiting case, which will be characterized in due course.


    Export/Citation:EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
    Social Networking:

    Item Type: Published Article
    Keywords: scientific representation, idealization, abstraction, scientific models
    Subjects: General Issues > Models and Idealization
    Depositing User: Steffen Ducheyne
    Date Deposited: 28 Jan 2012 18:03
    Last Modified: 28 Jan 2012 18:03
    Item ID: 9001
    Journal or Publication Title: Erkenntnis
    Official URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/t7v77784547n22...
    URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9001

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads