Martin, Joseph D (2012) Is the Contingentist/Inevitabilist Debate a Matter of Degrees? In:  Philosophy of Science Assoc. 23rd Biennial Mtg (San Diego, CA) > PSA 2012 Contributed Papers.
Debates between contingentists and inevitabilists contest whether the results of successful science are contingent or inevitable. This paper addresses lingering ambiguity in the way contingency is defined in these debates. I argue that contingency in science can be understood as a collection of distinct concepts, distinguished by how they hold science contingent, by what elements of science they hold contingent, and by what those elements are contingent upon. I present a preliminary taxonomy designed to characterize the full range positions available and illustrate that these constitute a diverse array, rather than a spectrum.
|Social Networking:|| |
Available Versions of this Item
- Is the Contingentist/Inevitabilist Debate a Matter of Degrees? (deposited 22 Jun 2012 09:15)[Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)