Pence, Charles H. (2012) It's Okay to Call Genetic Drift a “Force”. In: UNSPECIFIED.
DriftForcePreprint2.pdf - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
One hotly debated philosophical question in the analysis of evolutionary theory concerns whether or not evolution and the various factors which constitute it (selection, drift, mutation, and so on) may profitably be considered to be “forces” in the traditional, Newtonian sense. Several compelling arguments assert that the force picture is incoherent, due to the peculiar nature of genetic drift. I consider two of those arguments here – that drift lacks a predictable direction, and that drift is constitutive of evolutionary systems – and show that they both fail to demonstrate that a view of genetic drift as a force is untenable.
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)|
|Keywords:||evolutionary theory, natural selection, genetic drift, force, causation|
|Subjects:||Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory
General Issues > Causation
|Depositing User:||Charles H. Pence|
|Date Deposited:||26 Jul 2012 04:21|
|Last Modified:||24 Jan 2016 15:32|
Available Versions of this Item
It's Okay to Call Genetic Drift a “Force”. (deposited 11 Jul 2012 05:07)
- It's Okay to Call Genetic Drift a “Force”. (deposited 26 Jul 2012 04:21) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)