PhilSci Archive

It's Okay to Call Genetic Drift a “Force”

Pence, Charles H. (2012) It's Okay to Call Genetic Drift a “Force”. In: UNSPECIFIED.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
PDF
DriftForcePreprint2.pdf - Draft Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (150kB)

Abstract

One hotly debated philosophical question in the analysis of evolutionary theory concerns whether or not evolution and the various factors which constitute it (selection, drift, mutation, and so on) may profitably be considered to be “forces” in the traditional, Newtonian sense. Several compelling arguments assert that the force picture is incoherent, due to the peculiar nature of genetic drift. I consider two of those arguments here – that drift lacks a predictable direction, and that drift is constitutive of evolutionary systems – and show that they both fail to demonstrate that a view of genetic drift as a force is untenable.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Pence, Charles H.charles@charlespence.net
Keywords: evolutionary theory, natural selection, genetic drift, force, causation
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory
General Issues > Causation
Depositing User: Charles H. Pence
Date Deposited: 26 Jul 2012 04:21
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2016 15:32
Item ID: 9256
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9256

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item