Andersen, Holly (2011) Mechanisms, Laws, and Regularities. [Published Article]
| PDF Download (140Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
Leuridan argued that mechanisms cannot provide a genuine alternative to laws of nature as a model of explanation in the sciences, and he advocates Mitchell’s pragmatic account of laws. I first demonstrate that Leuridan gets the order of priority wrong among mechanisms, regularity, and laws, and then make some clarifying remarks about how laws and mechanisms relate to regularities. Mechanisms are not an explanatory alternative to regularities; they are an alternative to laws. The existence of stable regularities in nature is necessary for either model of explanation: regularities are what laws describe and what mechanisms explain.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Published Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | mechanisms; explanation; causation; regularities; laws |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology General Issues > Causation General Issues > Explanation General Issues > Laws of Nature |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Holly Andersen |
| Date Deposited: | 13 Mar 2013 09:51 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Mar 2013 09:51 |
| Item ID: | 9620 |
| Publisher: | University of Chicago |
| Official URL: | http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/659229 . |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9620 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


