Magal, Oran (2013) Is logic just last in line for the execution? Logic, holism, and the constitutive a priori. In: [2013] PhiloSTEM-5: The Fifth Midwest Workshop in Philosophy of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Fort Wayne, IN; 14-16 March 2013).
| PDF - Draft Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. Download (82Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
I argue that Quine’s early critique of Carnap’s conventionalism is in serious tension with the holism of "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", since his critique of convention- alism makes a compelling case for a privileged status either for logic, or for some other principle by means of which to derive consequences. Based on this, I call for a modification of Quinean holism, on grounds internal to Quine’s views. The result motivates a rehabilitation of Carnap’s notion of framework principles, and a rethinking of logic as a kind of relativised a priori.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Paper presented to Early Analytic Philosophy workshop as part of PhiloSTEM-5, March 15-16 2013. |
| Keywords: | Quine, Carnap, Conventionalism, Philosophy of Logic, Holism, Relativized apriori |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Conventionalism General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism |
| Conferences and Volumes: | [2013] PhiloSTEM-5: The Fifth Midwest Workshop in Philosophy of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Fort Wayne, IN; 14-16 March 2013) |
| Depositing User: | Oran Magal |
| Date Deposited: | 26 Mar 2013 08:10 |
| Last Modified: | 26 Mar 2013 08:10 |
| Item ID: | 9644 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9644 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


