Lutz, Sebastian (2013) Choosing the Analytic Component of Theories. [Preprint]
| PDF Download (183Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
I provide a compact reformulation of Carnap’s conditions of adequacy for the analytic and the synthetic component of a theory and show that, contrary to arguments by Winnie and Demopoulos, Carnap’s conditions of adequacy need not be supplemented by another condition. This has immediate implications for the analytic component of reduction sentences.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | analyticity; analytic-synthetic distinction; Carnap sentence; Ramsey sentence; reduction sentence; Przełęcki reduction pair; relativization sentence |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Conventionalism General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism General Issues > Structure of Theories |
| Depositing User: | Sebastian Lutz |
| Date Deposited: | 20 May 2013 16:02 |
| Last Modified: | 20 May 2013 16:02 |
| Item ID: | 9773 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9773 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |


