Glynn, Luke and Dardashti, Radin and Thebault, Karim P Y and Frisch, Mathias (2013) Unsharp Humean Chances in Statistical Physics: A Reply to Beisbart. [Preprint]
![[img]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF Download (931Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
In an illuminating article, Claus Beisbart argues that the recently-popular thesis that the probabilities of statistical mechanics (SM) are Best System chances runs into a serious obstacle: there is no one axiomatization of SM that is robustly best, as judged by the theoretical virtues of simplicity, strength, and fit. Beisbart takes this 'no clear winner' result to imply that the probabilities yielded by the competing axiomatizations simply fail to count as Best System chances. In this reply, we express sympathy for the 'no clear winner' thesis. However, we argue that an importantly different moral should be drawn from this. We contend that the implication for Humean chances is not that there are no SM chances, but rather that SM chances fail to be sharp.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Best System Analysis; Chance; Unsharp Probability; Statistical Mechanics |
| Subjects: | General Issues > Determinism/Indeterminism General Issues > Laws of Nature Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics Specific Sciences > Physics > Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Luke Glynn |
| Date Deposited: | 29 May 2013 10:44 |
| Last Modified: | 29 May 2013 10:44 |
| Item ID: | 9794 |
| URI: | http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9794 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}