The Variety-of-Evidence Thesis and the Reliability of Instruments: A Bayesian-Network Approach

Hartmann, Stephan and Bovens, Luc (2001) The Variety-of-Evidence Thesis and the Reliability of Instruments: A Bayesian-Network Approach.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires a viewer, such as Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

The variety of evidence thesis in confirmation theory states that more varied supporting evidence confirms a
hypothesis to a greater degree than less varied evidence. Under a very plausible interpretation of this
thesis, positive test results from multiple independent instruments confirm a hypothesis to a greater degree
than positive test results from a single instrument. We invoke Bayesian Networks to model confirmation on
grounds of evidence that is obtained from less than fully reliable instruments and show that the variety of
evidence thesis is not sacrosanct when testing is conducted with less than fully reliable instruments: under certain conditions, a hypothesis receives more confirmation from evidence that is obtained from one rather than from more independent instruments. In the appendix, we prove certain convergence results for large numbers of positive test results from single versus multiple less than fully reliable instruments.

Keywords:Confirmation theory, Bayesianism; variety of evidence thesis; Bayesian networks; unreliable instruments
Subjects:General Issues: Confirmation/Induction
ID Code:235
Deposited By:Hartmann, Stephan
Deposited On:17 April 2001