Why the Converse Consequence Condition cannot be accepted

Moretti, Luca (2003) Why the Converse Consequence Condition cannot be accepted.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires a viewer, such as Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
Microsoft Word - Requires a viewer, such as Microsoft Word Viewer

Abstract

Three confirmation principles discussed by Hempel are the Converse Consequence Condition, the Special Consequence Condition and the Entailment Condition. Le Morvan (1999) has argued that, when the choice among confirmation principles is just about them, it is the Converse Consequence Condition that must be rejected. In this paper, I make this argument definitive. In doing that, I will provide an indisputable proof that the simple conjunction of the Converse Consequence Condition and the Entailment Condition yields a disastrous consequence.

Keywords:Converse Consequence Condition, confirmation principle, paradox, hypothetico-deductivism, Hempel, Le Morvan.
Subjects:General Issues: Confirmation/Induction
ID Code:1402
Deposited By:Moretti, Luca
Deposited On:22 September 2003
Additional Information:This paper was published in Analysis 63, 4 (2003).