Response to Belot's "Whose Devil? Which Details?"

Batterman, Robert (2004) Response to Belot's "Whose Devil? Which Details?".

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires a viewer, such as Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

I respond to Belot's argument and defend the view that sometimes "fundamental" are explanatorily inadequate and need to be supplemented with certain aspects of less fundamental "theories emeritus."

Commentary on:	Belot, Gordon (2003) Whose Devil? Which Details?.
EPrint Type:	Preprint
Keywords:	Explanation, Asymptotics, Intertheoretic Relations
Subjects:	General Issues: Models and Idealization General Issues: Explanation Specific Sciences: Physics
ID Code:	1623
Deposited By:	Batterman, Robert
Deposited On:	18 Febuary 2004

Commentary/Response Threads

Error: Unknown Citation Style "eprint_thread_commentary"
- Error: Unknown Citation Style "eprint_thread_commentary" [Currently Displayed]
  - Error: Unknown Citation Style "eprint_thread_commentary"
  - Error: Unknown Citation Style "eprint_thread_commentary"