A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?
Pooley, Oliver (2006) A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?.
Full text available as: |
Abstract
Doubts are raised concerning Rickles' claim that ``an exact analog of the hole argument can be constructed in the loop representation of quantum gravity'' (Rickles, `A new spin on the hole argument', Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2005) 415–434).
| Commentary on: | Rickles, Dean (2004) A New Spin on the Hole Argument. |
|---|---|
| EPrint Type: | Preprint |
| Keywords: | Hole argument, Loop quantum gravity, Spin-networks, Substantivalism, Relationalism, General covariance |
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences: Physics: Symmetries/Invariances Specific Sciences: Physics: Relativity Theory Specific Sciences: Physics: Quantum Mechanics |
| ID Code: | 2938 |
| Deposited By: | Pooley, Oliver |
| Deposited On: | 04 October 2006 |
| Additional Information: | This is a preprint of: `A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?', Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (2006) 372–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.11.003 Please cite the published version. There is a reply by Rickles in the same issue of the journal. |
Commentary/Response Threads
- Error: Unknown Citation Style "eprint_thread_commentary"
- Error: Unknown Citation Style "eprint_thread_commentary" [Currently Displayed]