Points, particles, and structural realism
Pooley, Oliver (2005) Points, particles, and structural realism.
Full text available as: |
Abstract
In his paper ``What is Structural Realism?'' James Ladyman drew a distinction between epistemological structural realism and metaphysical (or ontic) structural realism. He also drew a suggestive analogy between the perennial debate between substantivalist and relationalist interpretations of spacetime on the one hand, and the debate about whether quantum mechanics treats identical particles as individuals or as `non-individuals' on the other. In both cases, Ladyman's suggestion is that an ontic structural realist interpretation of the physics might be just what is needed to overcome the stalemate.
The main thesis of this paper is that, whatever the interpretative difficulties of generally covariant spacetime physics are, they do not support or suggest structural realism. In particular, I hope to show that there is in fact no analogy that supports a similar interpretation of the metaphysics of spacetime points and of quantum particles.
| Keywords: | General convariance, permutation invariance, identical particles, individuality, substantivalism, relationalism, structural realism |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences: Physics: Relativity Theory General Issues: Realism/Anti-realism Specific Sciences: Physics: Quantum Mechanics |
| ID Code: | 2939 |
| Deposited By: | Pooley, Oliver |
| Deposited On: | 04 October 2006 |
| Additional Information: | A version of this paper will appear in Rickles, French and Saatsi (eds), The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press. Please quote from and cite the published version. |