How do Structural Formulas Embody the Theory of Organic Chemistry?

Goodwin, William (2008) How do Structural Formulas Embody the Theory of Organic Chemistry?.

Full text available as:
Microsoft Word - Requires a viewer, such as Microsoft Word Viewer
PDF - Requires a viewer, such as Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.
PDF - Requires a viewer, such as Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

Organic chemistry provides fertile ground for scholars interested in understanding the role of non-linguistic representations in scientific thinking. In this discipline, it is plausible to think of textual representation as supplementing theories whose principle expression is diagrammatic. Among the many sorts of diagrams employed by organic chemists, structural formulas are the most important. In this paper, by examining two central episodes in the development of structural formulas -- Kekulé’s proposal of a structure for benzene and Ingold’s explanation of dipole moments in terms of ‘mesomerism’ – I investigate how the norms for the production and interpretation of structural formulas evolve in response to experimental results. I conclude that one principle way in which structural formulas embody the theory of organic chemistry is through these evolving norms.

Keywords:organic chemistry, visual representation, scientific theories
Subjects:General Issues: Structure of Theories
Specific Sciences: Chemistry
ID Code:4202
Deposited By:Goodwin, William Mark
Deposited On:25 September 2008
Additional Information:to be presented at PSA 2008