Mitsch, Chris
(2019)
An Examination of Some Aspects of Howard Stein's Work.
[Preprint]
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/15926/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/An%20Examination%20of%20Some%20Aspects%20of%20Howard%20Stein%27s%20Work.pdf)  Preview |
|
Text
An Examination of Some Aspects of Howard Stein's Work.pdf
- Accepted Version
Download (233kB)
| Preview
|
Abstract
Some understand Stein’s “Yes, but…” as an entry in the realism—instrumentalism debate (RID) itself, albeit one dissatisfied with then-extant positions. In this paper, however, I argue the opposite: Stein’s conception of science and his approach to its history and philosophy actually preclude the RID. First, I characterize Stein as persistently attending to his own historical and philosophical methods. I then describe his conception of science as both a dialectic and an enterprise, and I draw from this conception several conclusions about the relations between science and its history and philosophy. Finally, I provide a reading of “Yes, but…” that follows from Stein’s conception of science. On this reading, the RID is either irrelevant to or wrong of science and, moreover, distracts from a legitimate inquiry. I conclude by interpreting Stein’s remark that there is ``no difference that makes a difference’’ between a cogent and enlightened realism and a sophisticated instrumentalism.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}