PhilSci Archive

Why Did We Think We Dreamed in Black and White?

Schwitzgebel, Eric (2001) Why Did We Think We Dreamed in Black and White? [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
PDF
dreamb&w010430.pdf

Download (96kB)

Abstract

In the 1950's, dream researchers commonly thought that dreams were predominantly a black-and-white phenomenon, although both earlier and later treatments of dreaming presume or assert that dreams have color. The first half of the twentieth century saw the rise of black-and-white film media, and it is likely that the emergence of the view that dreams are black-and-white was connected with this change in media technology. If our opinions about basic features of our dreams can change with changes in technology, it seems to follow that our knowledge of the phenomenology of our own dreams is much less secure than we might at first have thought it to be.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Schwitzgebel, Eric
Keywords: dream, dreams, dreaming, black and white, black-and-white, phenomenology, self-knowledge, introspection, fiction, history of psychology, media, film, color, experience
Subjects: General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
Specific Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User: Eric Schwitzgebel
Date Deposited: 09 May 2001
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:10
Item ID: 267
Subjects: General Issues > History of Science Case Studies
Specific Sciences > Psychology
Date: April 2001
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/267

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item