PhilSci Archive

The Use of Examples

Birk, Elisabeth (2007) The Use of Examples. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Examples_Feb_07.pdf

Download (42kB)

Abstract

One of the most important problems for a study of symbolic practices (pictorial, verbal or other) is the choice of a language of description that is general enough to allow for comparisons between different symbolic practices and specific enough to allow for meaningful descriptions of actual practices. I will argue that Goodman’s theory of symbols provides some of the categories needed for such an analysis. I will try to indicate this by looking at Goodman’s analysis of a symbolic practice that – though widely used in many different kinds of discourse – has generally not received much attention: the giving of examples. Goodman’s extensional description of exemplification allows us to differentiate between various types of examples and to determine what we mean when we say that examples ‘show’ something. In this way, conflicting approaches to the question of examples (namely Kant and Wittgenstein) can be seen as complementary. A theory of symbols can operate these clarifications by virtue of its strict extensionalism.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Birk, Elisabeth
Keywords: Examples, Goodman, Kant
Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
Depositing User: Elisabeth Birk
Date Deposited: 14 Feb 2007
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:14
Item ID: 3175
Subjects: General Issues > Structure of Theories
Date: 2007
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3175

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item