Kilinc, Berna (2010) Meta-analysis as Judgment Aggregation. In: UNSPECIFIED.

Preview

PDF Berna_Kilinc_EPSA_proceedings.pdf Download (156kB)

Abstract

My goal in this paper is to see the extent to which judgment aggregation methods subsume meta-analytic ones. To this end, I derive a generalized version of the classical Condorcet Jury Theorem (CJT), the aggregative implications of which have been widely exploited in the area of rational choice theory, but not yet in philosophy of science. I contend that the generalized CJT that I prove below is useful for modelling at least some meta-analytic procedures.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Kilinc, Berna
Keywords:	meta-analysis, evidence, data
Subjects:	General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Depositing User:	Berna Kilinc
Date Deposited:	03 Apr 2010
Last Modified:	07 Oct 2010 15:19
Item ID:	5272
Subjects:	General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Date:	2010
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5272

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item