Lutz, Sebastian (2010) On Sober's Criterion of Contrastive Testability. [Preprint]

Preview

PDF on_sobers_testability.pdf - Draft Version Download (351kB)

Abstract

Elliott Sober has suggested his criterion of contrastive testability as an improvement over previous criteria of empirical significance like falsifiability. I argue that his criterion renders almost any theory empirically significant because its restrictions on auxiliary assumptions are to weak. Even when the criterion is modified to avoid this trivialization, it fails to meet other conditions of adequacy for a criterion of empirical significance that follow from Sober's position. I suggest to define empirical significance as empirical non-equivalence to a tautology, because this definition does meet the conditions of adequacy. Specifically, it is equivalent to the standard Bayesian criterion of empirical significance whenever all probabilities are defined and contains falsifiability as a special case. This latter feature is important because those conditions of adequacy that apply to criteria of deductive empirical significance single out falsifiability.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Lutz, Sebastian sebastian.lutz@gmx.net
Keywords:	empirical significance, testability, empiricism, falsifiability
Subjects:	General Issues > Operationalism/Instrumentalism General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience General Issues > Structure of Theories General Issues > Theory/Observation
Depositing User:	Sebastian Lutz
Date Deposited:	14 Dec 2010 12:08
Last Modified:	18 Apr 2011 11:37
Item ID:	8424
Subjects:	General Issues > Operationalism/Instrumentalism General Issues > Science vs. Pseudoscience General Issues > Structure of Theories General Issues > Theory/Observation
Date:	13 December 2010
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8424

Available Versions of this Item

• On Sober's Criterion of Contrastive Testability. (deposited 14 Dec 2010 12:08) [Currently Displayed]
  • On a Contrastive Criterion of Testability II: The Material Inadequacy of Contrastive Testability. (deposited 18 Apr 2011 11:37)
  • On a Contrastive Criterion of Testability I: Defining Contrastive Testability. (deposited 18 Apr 2011 11:37)

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item