Curiel, Erik (2015) On the Existence of Spacetime Structure. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF (Forthcomining in British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2015)
exist-st-struct.pdf - Accepted Version Download (592kB) |
Abstract
I examine the debate between substantivalists and relationalists
about the ontological character of spacetime and conclude it is not
well posed. I argue that the so-called Hole Argument does not bear
on the debate, because it provides no clear criterion to distinguish
the positions. I propose two such precise criteria and construct
separate arguments based on each to yield contrary conclusions, one
supportive of something like relationalism and the other of
something like substantivalism. The lesson is that one must fix an
investigative context in order to make such criteria precise, but
different investigative contexts yield inconsistent results. I
examine questions of existence about spacetime structures other than
the spacetime manifold itself to argue that it is more fruitful to
focus on pragmatic issues of physicality, a notion that lends itself
to several different explications, all of philosophical interest,
none privileged a priori over any of the others. I conclude
by suggesting an extension of the lessons of my arguments to the
broader debate between realists and instrumentalists.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Available Versions of this Item
-
On the Existence of Spacetime Structure. (deposited 04 Sep 2014 12:51)
- On the Existence of Spacetime Structure. (deposited 16 Sep 2015 12:57)
- On the Existence of Spacetime Structure. (deposited 12 Mar 2015 17:42) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |