Boudry, Maarten and Vlerick, Michael and Edis, Taner (2019) The end of science? On human cognitive limitations and how to overcome them. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
Text
The end of science - BIPH submission - clean.docx Download (55kB) |
Abstract
What, if any, are the limits of human understanding? Epistemic pessimists, sobered by our humble evolutionary origins, have argued that some parts of the universe will forever remain beyond our ken. But what exactly does it mean to say that humans are ‘cognitively closed’ to some parts of the world, or that some problems will forever remain ‘mysteries’? In this paper we develop a conceptual toolbox for thinking about different forms and modalities of cognitive limitation, which are often conflated by the so-called ‘new mysterians’. We distinguish between representational access (the ability to develop accurate scientific representations of reality) and imaginative understanding (immediate, intuitive comprehension of those representations), as well as between different modalities of cognitive limitation. Next, we look at tried-and-tested strategies for overcoming our innate cognitive limitations, drawing from the literature on distributed cognition and the ‘extended mind’. Most importantly, we argue that this collection of mind-extension devices is combinatorial and open-ended. In the end, we turn the table on the mysterians: for every alleged ‘mystery’, they should demonstrate that no possible combination of mind extension devices will bring us any closer to a solution.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||||||||
Keywords: | new mysterianism; cognitive closure; epistemic boundedness; imaginative understanding; representational access | ||||||||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Philosophers of Science |
||||||||||||
Depositing User: | Maarten Maarten Boudry | ||||||||||||
Date Deposited: | 04 Jan 2020 02:15 | ||||||||||||
Last Modified: | 04 Jan 2020 02:15 | ||||||||||||
Item ID: | 16782 | ||||||||||||
Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Biology > Evolutionary Theory Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science General Issues > Philosophers of Science |
||||||||||||
Date: | October 2019 | ||||||||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16782 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The end of inquiry? How to overcome human cognitive limitations. (deposited 12 Feb 2018 13:50)
-
The end of inquiry? How to overcome human cognitive limitations. (deposited 08 Jun 2018 17:32)
-
The end of science? On human cognitive limitations and how to overcome them. (deposited 28 Oct 2019 02:34)
- The end of science? On human cognitive limitations and how to overcome them. (deposited 04 Jan 2020 02:15) [Currently Displayed]
-
The end of science? On human cognitive limitations and how to overcome them. (deposited 28 Oct 2019 02:34)
-
The end of inquiry? How to overcome human cognitive limitations. (deposited 08 Jun 2018 17:32)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |