Aizawa, Kenneth (2020) Some theoretical and empirical background to Fodor’s systematicity arguments. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, 35 (1). pp. 29-43. ISSN 2171-679X

Preview

Text def_20464_Aizawa_Theoria35-1.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (198kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper aims to clarify certain features of the systematicity arguments by a review of some of the largely underexamined background in Chomsky’s and Fodor’s early work on transformational grammar.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Published Article or Volume
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Aizawa, Kenneth ken.aizawa@gmail.com
Additional Information:	ISSN: 0495-4548 (print)
Keywords:	Chomsky, Fodor, systematicity, productivity, transformational grammar.
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Concepts and Representations General Issues > Philosophers of Science
Depositing User:	Unnamed user with email theoria@ehu.es
Date Deposited:	05 Mar 2020 01:25
Last Modified:	05 Mar 2020 01:25
Item ID:	16968
Journal or Publication Title:	THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
Publisher:	Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Official URL:	https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/...
DOI or Unique Handle:	10.1387/theoria.20464
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Concepts and Representations General Issues > Philosophers of Science
Date:	January 2020
Page Range:	pp. 29-43
Volume:	35
Number:	1
ISSN:	2171-679X
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/16968

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item