PhilSci Archive

Can Humeans be Scientific Realist?

Guo, Bixin (2022) Can Humeans be Scientific Realist? [Preprint]

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
Text
Humean 221220.pdf

Download (228kB) | Preview

Abstract

Many philosophers who defend a Humean account of laws also endorse scientific realism, such as David Lewis and Barry Loewer. It seems as if scientific realism and Humean accounts of laws of nature are orthogonal to, and so are naturally compatible with, one another. I argue otherwise: Humean accounts of laws are at odds with scientific realism. In particular, I focus on two of the most prominent Humean accounts, Lewis’ Best System Account and Loewer’s Package Deal Account, and argue: the latter conflicts with standard scientific realism, while the former does not conform to scientific practice.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Guo, Bixin
Keywords: Humean Accounts of Laws, Scientific Realism, Scientific Practice, Objectivity, Scientific Objects
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
General Issues > Laws of Nature
General Issues > Philosophers of Science
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Bixin Guo
Date Deposited: 08 Feb 2023 23:26
Last Modified: 08 Feb 2023 23:26
Item ID: 21738
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
General Issues > Laws of Nature
General Issues > Philosophers of Science
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Date: 2022
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/21738

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item