Nie, Chenwei (2025) One-Factor versus Two-Factor Theory of Delusion: Replies to Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof. Neuroethics, 18 (4). ISSN 1874-5490

Text s12152-024-09575-0.pdf Download (515kB)

Abstract

I would like to thank Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof for their stimulating comments on my 2023 paper in Neuroethics. In this reply, I will (1) articulate some deeper disagreements that may underpin our disagreement on the nature of delusion, (2) clarify their misrepresentation of my previous arguments as a defence of the two-factor theory in particular, and (3) finally conduct a comparison between the Maherian one-factor theory and the two-factor theory, showing that the two-factor theory is better supported by evidence.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Published Article or Volume
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Nie, Chenwei
Keywords:	One-factor theory; Two-factor theory; Delusion; Evidence
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Medicine > Psychiatry Specific Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User:	Chenwei Nie
Date Deposited:	14 Dec 2024 13:08
Last Modified:	14 Dec 2024 13:08
Item ID:	24398
Journal or Publication Title:	Neuroethics
Official URL:	https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12152-0...
DOI or Unique Handle:	10.1007/s12152-024-09575-0
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Medicine > Psychiatry Specific Sciences > Psychology
Date:	2025
Volume:	18
Number:	4
ISSN:	1874-5490
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/24398

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com

Actions (login required)

View Item