PhilSci Archive

Weak and Local Methodological Continuity across Science, Naturalized, and Autonomous Metaphysics

Borge, Bruno (2026) Weak and Local Methodological Continuity across Science, Naturalized, and Autonomous Metaphysics. [Preprint]

[img] Text
Weak and Local Methodological Continuity_final.pdf

Download (530kB)

Abstract

This paper defends weak and local methodological continuity—that is, continuity with respect to specific shared devices rather than global methodological frameworks—across science, naturalized metaphysics, and autonomous metaphysics. The contemporary debate has conflated two distinct continuity problems: whether naturalized metaphysics can share in science's epistemic success and whether proximity to science privileges certain metaphysical approaches over others. Additionally, continuity claims involve multiple dimensions that are not always properly distinguished. The paper makes two interconnected contributions. First, I develop a triadic framework that distinguishes these continuity problems and dimensions, providing analytical tools for practice-sensitive assessments. Second, applying this framework, I argue that thought experiments, understood as shared methodological devices, exhibit methodological continuity across all three domains. The analysis shows that thought experiments perform structurally analogous roles in each domain despite operating under different epistemic constraints and background commitments. This methodological continuity neither presupposes nor entails strong epistemic conclusions, but demonstrates that the science-metaphysics relationship resists simple dichotomies of complete continuity or categorical discontinuity. The framework suggests a productive methodological reorientation: rather than debating global continuity a priori, philosophical inquiry should examine how specific methodological devices function across domains through careful, local case studies. Thought experiments provide one such case; the approach developed here applies to other shared methodological tools.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Borge, Brunobrunojborge@gmail.com0000-0002-1755-9690
Keywords: metaphysics, methodological continuity, thought experiments, naturalized metaphysics, science and metaphysics, epistemic warrant
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Thought Experiments
Depositing User: Dr. Bruno Borge
Date Deposited: 16 Apr 2026 12:39
Last Modified: 16 Apr 2026 12:39
Item ID: 29152
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
General Issues > Thought Experiments
Date: April 2026
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29152

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item