Bradley, Clara and Weatherall, James Owen (2026) We Have Never Been Sophisticated. [Preprint]
|
Text
Sophistication (10).pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (292kB) |
Abstract
Many philosophers of physics maintain that a physical theory that exhibits (certain kinds of) symmetries is flawed, on the grounds that such theories posit "excess structure". In an influential paper, Dewar [2019, "Sophistication about Symmetries", Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 70: 485-521] introduces a distinction between "reduction" and "sophistication" as alternative ways of removing excess structure. In this paper we re-examine the distinction as Dewar draws it, and we argue that there is no physically or philosophically important distinction between what Dewar calls "reduction" and what he calls "internal sophistication". We then argue that there are multiple notions of "reduction" in the literature that ought to be distinguished, both in motivation and in outcome.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
|||||||||
| Keywords: | symmetry, sophistication, reduction, gauge theory | |||||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances |
|||||||||
| Depositing User: | James Owen Weatherall | |||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 15 May 2026 19:28 | |||||||||
| Last Modified: | 15 May 2026 19:28 | |||||||||
| Item ID: | 29629 | |||||||||
| Subjects: | Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Symmetries/Invariances |
|||||||||
| Date: | 2026 | |||||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29629 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |



