Lopez-Wild, Josiah (2026) Countable Dutch Book Arguments. [Preprint]
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
CDBAs.pdf Download (301kB) |
Abstract
I show that a standard argument against the possibility of a valid Dutch book argument for countable additivity is too quick because it fails to distinguish different notions of convergence for random variables. Making this distinction allows for the precise formulation of such a Dutch book argument.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Preprint | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Dutch book, countable additivity, Bayesian epistemology, probability | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Mr. Josiah Lopez-Wild | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 16 May 2026 12:07 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 16 May 2026 12:07 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 29646 | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > Confirmation/Induction Specific Sciences > Probability/Statistics |
||||||
| Date: | 2026 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29646 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}