PhilSci Archive

Sensorimotor teleology and goal-directedness. An organismic framework for normative behaviour

Barandiaran, Xabier and Rama, Tiago (2025) Sensorimotor teleology and goal-directedness. An organismic framework for normative behaviour. [Preprint]

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
Barandiaran and Rama - 2026 - Sensorimotor teleology and goal-directedness - FINAL-resub.pdf - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Teleosemantics explains meaning by appealing to the biological norms that make error possible, but most work in the field still anchors those norms in evolutionary “selected‐effect” functions. We develop an organismic alternative grounded in the self-maintenance of autonomous systems. Elaborating upon sensorimotor theory and enactivism, we reconceptualise goals as higher order constraints (as shaping transient attractors in a dynamic sensorimotor field) and show how they are nested into a heterarchy of means–end relations connecting the global self‑maintenance of the identity of a sensorimotor organization with the most local sensorimotor coordinations. We then identify the minimal necessary requirements for genuine teleological behaviour: 1. Initiation that individuates an action in relation to a goal, 2. Modulatory execution that adaptively compensates perturbations or deploys alternative strategies in relation to the goal, and 3. Meaningful termination through successful acknowledgment and transition, goal-sensitive persistence, or coherent abandonment. We locate normativity and error in the dynamic presuppositions among sensorimotor schemes and goals: failure manifests as incoordination within, or across, goal branches. We finally illustrate our account with a detailed analysis of the well known A-not-B error in psychology, showing how infants meet our teleological criteria while revealing incoordination as tension breakdowns inside a heterarchy of goals and sensorimotor schemes. Teleological behaviour, therefore, is the management of tensions and dynamic presuppositions within the goal heterarchy, not a chain of mechanical causes, thus delivering a naturalised notion of purposiveness that opens up an alternative route to teleosemantics beyond evolutionary selection.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Barandiaran, Xabierxabier.academic@barandiaran.net0000-0002-4763-6845
Rama, Tiagotrama.folco@gmail.com0000-0002-1531-7233
Additional Information: New version resubmitted after revision
Keywords: Behavioural Norms; Teleology, Goal-directedness; Organizational Biology; Teleosemantics; A-not-B Error; Sensorimotor Normativity
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Action
Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology
General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Complex Systems
General Issues > Explanation
Specific Sciences > Psychology
Depositing User: Dr. Xabier E. Barandiaran
Date Deposited: 27 May 2026 13:26
Last Modified: 27 May 2026 13:26
Item ID: 29743
Subjects: General Issues > Scientific Metaphysics
Specific Sciences > Cognitive Science > Action
Specific Sciences > Biology > Function/Teleology
General Issues > Causation
Specific Sciences > Complex Systems
General Issues > Explanation
Specific Sciences > Psychology
Date: 19 May 2025
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29743

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item