PhilSci Archive

Scientific Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate

Saatsi, Juha (2010) Scientific Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
PDF
EPSA09_Saatsi.pdf

Download (406kB)

Abstract

This paper discusses three shortcomings of the current state of the debate regarding historical evidence against scientific realism. Attending to these issues will direct the debate away from over-generalising wholesale arguments.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Saatsi, Juha
Keywords: Miracles argument; Kirchhoff; Pessimistic induction
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Juha Saatsi
Date Deposited: 30 Mar 2010
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2010 15:19
Item ID: 5230
Subjects: General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Date: 2010
URI: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5230

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item