Saatsi, Juha (2010) Scientific Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate. In: UNSPECIFIED.
|
PDF
EPSA09_Saatsi.pdf Download (406kB) |
Abstract
This paper discusses three shortcomings of the current state of the debate regarding historical evidence against scientific realism. Attending to these issues will direct the debate away from over-generalising wholesale arguments.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | Miracles argument; Kirchhoff; Pessimistic induction | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism | ||||||
Depositing User: | Juha Saatsi | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 30 Mar 2010 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:19 | ||||||
Item ID: | 5230 | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism | ||||||
Date: | 2010 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5230 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |