Bogen, Jim (2002) Analyzing Causality: The opposite of Counterfactual is Factual. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)
Microsoft Word (.doc)
milwaukee_current__(1).doc Download (123kB) |
Abstract
Using Jim Woodward's counterfactual dependency account of causality as an example, this paper argues that causal claims cannot be fuitfully analyzed by including the truth or falsity of counterfactuals among their truth conditions. The main reasons this derive from my understanding of Nuel Belnap's and his co-authors discussion of predictions about indeterministic systems.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Other | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||
Keywords: | causality, explanation, counterfactuals | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Causation General Issues > Explanation |
||||||
Depositing User: | jim bogen | ||||||
Date Deposited: | 10 Sep 2002 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2010 15:11 | ||||||
Item ID: | 797 | ||||||
Public Domain: | No | ||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Causation General Issues > Explanation |
||||||
Date: | September 2002 | ||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/797 |
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
View Item |