PhilSci Archive

Revamping Hypothetico-Deductivism: A Dialectic Account of Confirmation

Betz, Gregor (2011) Revamping Hypothetico-Deductivism: A Dialectic Account of Confirmation. [Preprint]

HD_betz.pdf - Draft Version

Download (808kB)


We use recently developed approaches in argumentation theory in order to revamp the hypothetico-deductive model of confirmation, thus alleviating the well-known paradoxes the H-D account faces. More specifically, we introduce the concept of dialectic confirmation on the background of the so-called theory of dialectical structures (Betz 2010, 2011). Dialectic confirmation generalises hypothetico-deductive confirmation and mitigates the raven paradox, the grue paradox, the tacking paradox, the paradox from conceptual difference, and the problem of novelty.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Keywords: hypothetico-deductive confirmation; degree of justification; argumentation theory; tacking paradox; raven paradox; grue paradox; novel evidence
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Depositing User: Gregor Betz
Date Deposited: 03 Oct 2011 12:21
Last Modified: 03 Oct 2011 12:21
Item ID: 8822
Subjects: General Issues > Confirmation/Induction
Date: 2011

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item