Halvorson, Hans (2011) What scientific theories could not be. [Preprint]

Preview

PDF semantic-defect-revised2.pdf Download (347kB)

Abstract

According to the semantic view of scientific theories, theories are classes of models. I show that this view -- if taken literally -- leads to absurdities. In particular, this view equates theories that are distinct, and it distinguishes theories that are equivalent. Furthermore, the semantic view lacks the resources to explicate interesting theoretical relations, such as embeddability of one theory into another. The untenability of the semantic view -- as currently formulated -- threatens to undermine scientific structuralism.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Halvorson, Hans hhalvors@princeton.edu
Keywords:	semantic view of theories, received view, constructive empiricism
Subjects:	General Issues > Structure of Theories
Depositing User:	Hans Halvorson
Date Deposited:	11 Dec 2011 20:03
Last Modified:	11 Dec 2011 20:03
Item ID:	8940
Subjects:	General Issues > Structure of Theories
Date:	18 May 2011
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8940

Available Versions of this Item

• What scientific theories could not be. (deposited 20 May 2011 06:35)
  • What scientific theories could not be. (deposited 11 Dec 2011 20:03) [Currently Displayed]

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item