Bright, Liam Kofi and Dang, Haixin and Heesen, Remco (2018) A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers. Erkenntnis, 83 (2). pp. 231-252. ISSN 0165-0106
This is the latest version of this item.
|
Text
Bright et al 2018 A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers Erkenntnis.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (467kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of judgment aggregation in science. How should scientists decide which propositions to assert in a collaborative document? We distinguish the question of what to write in a collaborative document from the question of collective belief. We argue that recent objections to the application of the formal literature on judgment aggregation to the problem of judgment aggregation in science apply to the latter, not the former question. The formal literature has introduced various desiderata for an aggregation procedure. Proposition-wise majority voting emerges as a procedure that satisfies all desiderata which represent norms of science. An interesting consequence is that not all collaborating scientists need to endorse every proposition asserted in a collaborative document.
Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
Social Networking: |
Item Type: | Published Article or Volume | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creators: |
|
||||||||||||
Additional Information: | This paper is published in Erkenntnis under open access. | ||||||||||||
Keywords: | Philosophy of science Collaboration Judgment aggregation Social epistemology | ||||||||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Science and Policy General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||||||||
Depositing User: | Remco Heesen | ||||||||||||
Date Deposited: | 06 Jul 2018 15:53 | ||||||||||||
Last Modified: | 09 Aug 2023 14:14 | ||||||||||||
Item ID: | 14839 | ||||||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Erkenntnis | ||||||||||||
Publisher: | Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.) | ||||||||||||
Official URL: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9887-1 | ||||||||||||
DOI or Unique Handle: | 10.1007/s10670-017-9887-1 | ||||||||||||
Subjects: | General Issues > Decision Theory General Issues > Science and Policy General Issues > Values In Science |
||||||||||||
Date: | April 2018 | ||||||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 231-252 | ||||||||||||
Volume: | 83 | ||||||||||||
Number: | 2 | ||||||||||||
ISSN: | 0165-0106 | ||||||||||||
URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/14839 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Judgment Aggregation in Science. (deposited 31 Oct 2014 21:53)
-
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers. (deposited 27 Mar 2017 13:19)
- A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers. (deposited 06 Jul 2018 15:53) [Currently Displayed]
-
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers. (deposited 27 Mar 2017 13:19)
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
View Item |