Lawler, Insa and Zimmermann, Georg
(2019)
Misalignment between research hypotheses and statistical hypotheses – A threat to evidence-based medicine?
In: UNSPECIFIED.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16288/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/Misalignments%20between%20research%20hypotheses%20and%20statistical%20hypotheses_2019_Lawler_Zimmermann.pdf)  Preview |
|
Text
Misalignments between research hypotheses and statistical hypotheses_2019_Lawler_Zimmermann.pdf
Download (378kB)
| Preview
|
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine frequently uses statistical hypothesis testing. In this paradigm, data can only disconfirm a research hypothesis’ competitors: One tests the negation of a statistical hypothesis that is supposed to correspond to the research hypothesis. In practice, these hypotheses are often misaligned. For instance, directional research hypotheses are often paired with non-directional statistical hypotheses. Prima facie, one cannot gain proper evidence for one’s research hypothesis employing a misaligned statistical hypothesis. This paper sheds lights on the nature of and the reasons for such misalignments and it provides a thorough analysis of whether they pose a threat to evidence-based medicine. The upshots are that the misalignments are often hidden for clinicians and that although some cases of misalignments can be partially counterbalanced, the overall threat is non-negligible. The counterbalances either lead to methodological inadequacy, loss of statistical power, or involve a lack of information that could be crucial for decision making. This result casts doubt on various findings of medical studies in addition to issues associated with under-powered studies or the replication crisis.
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}