Magal, Oran (2013) Is logic just last in line for the execution? Logic, holism, and the constitutive a priori. In: UNSPECIFIED.

Preview

PDF OMagal_EAP_2013.pdf - Draft Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. Download (84kB)

Abstract

I argue that Quine’s early critique of Carnap’s conventionalism is in serious tension with the holism of "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", since his critique of convention- alism makes a compelling case for a privileged status either for logic, or for some other principle by means of which to derive consequences. Based on this, I call for a modification of Quinean holism, on grounds internal to Quine’s views. The result motivates a rehabilitation of Carnap’s notion of framework principles, and a rethinking of logic as a kind of relativised a priori.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Magal, Oran oran.magal@gmail.com
Additional Information:	Paper presented to Early Analytic Philosophy workshop as part of PhiloSTEM-5, March 15-16 2013.
Keywords:	Quine, Carnap, Conventionalism, Philosophy of Logic, Holism, Relativized apriori
Subjects:	General Issues > Conventionalism General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
Depositing User:	Oran Magal
Date Deposited:	26 Mar 2013 12:10
Last Modified:	26 Mar 2013 12:10
Item ID:	9644
Subjects:	General Issues > Conventionalism General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science General Issues > Logical Positivism/Logical Empiricism
Date:	March 2013
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9644

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item