Scholl, Raphael (2013) Confessions of a Complexity Skeptic.

Preview

PDF scholl-complexity-preprint.pdf - Accepted Version Download (125kB)

Abstract

Three objections to Max Urchs's paper on complexity are discussed. First, Urchs's macroeconomic illustrations of the benefits of complexity thinking are open to more conventional interpretations. Second, Urchs formulates a thesis concerning the relationship between science and society which is untenable if taken as a historical claim and insufficiently developed if taken as a metaphor. Third, methodological problems in history and philosophy of science plague Urchs's discussion of neuroscience.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Published Article or Volume
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Scholl, Raphael raphael.scholl@gmail.com
Additional Information:	To appear in: M. C. Galavotti, S. Hartmann, M. Weber, W. Gonzalez, D. Dieks, and T. Uebel, eds., New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. Springer.
Keywords:	complexity economics neuroscience policy analysis history and philosophy of science methodology
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Economics General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Neuroscience General Issues > Science and Society
Depositing User:	Raphael Scholl
Date Deposited:	04 Mar 2014 12:14
Last Modified:	04 Mar 2014 12:14
Item ID:	10548
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Economics General Issues > History of Science Case Studies Specific Sciences > Neuroscience General Issues > Science and Society
Date:	2013
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10548

Available Versions of this Item

• Confessions of a Complexity Skeptic. (deposited 25 Jun 2013 05:08)
  • Confessions of a Complexity Skeptic. (deposited 04 Mar 2014 12:14) [Currently Displayed]

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item