Roberts, Bryan W. (2014) Disregarding the 'Hole Argument'. [Preprint]

Preview

PDF DisregardingTheHoleArgument.pdf Download (242kB)

Abstract

Jim Weatherall has suggested that Einstein's hole argument, as presented by Earman and Norton (1987), is based on a misleading use of mathematics. I argue on the contrary that Weatherall demands an implausible restriction on how mathematics is used. The hole argument, on the other hand, is in no new danger at all.

---

Export/Citation:

EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL

Social Networking:

Share |

---

Item Type:	Preprint
Creators:	Creators Email ORCID Roberts, Bryan W.
Keywords:	Einstein, hole argument, spacetime, substantivalism, relationism, representation
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Depositing User:	Dr. Bryan W. Roberts
Date Deposited:	16 Dec 2014 19:45
Last Modified:	20 Sep 2015 19:02
Item ID:	11192
Subjects:	Specific Sciences > Physics Specific Sciences > Physics > Relativity Theory
Date:	2014
URI:	https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11192

Available Versions of this Item

• Disregarding the 'Hole Argument'. (deposited 16 Dec 2014 19:45) [Currently Displayed]
  • Disregarding the 'Hole Argument'. (deposited 20 Sep 2015 19:02)

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item