Maxwell, Nicholas (2014) Three Criticisms of Newton's Inductive Argument in the Principia. Advances in Historical Studies, 3. pp. 2-11.
This is the latest version of this item.
![[img]](https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_msword.png) |
Microsoft Word
27_Three_Criticisms_of_Newton_Final_I_Version.doc - Submitted Version Download (299kB) |
Abstract
In this paper I discuss how Newton's inductive argument of the Principia can be defended against criticisms levelled against it by Duhem, Popper and myself. I argue that Duhem's and Popper's criticisms can be countered, but mine cannot. They require that we reconsider, not just Newton's inductive argument in the Principia, but the nature of science more generally. The methods of science, whether conceived along inductivist or hypothetico-deductivist lines, make implicit metaphysical presuppositions which rigour requires we make explicit within science so that they can be critically assessed, alternatives being developed and assessed, in the hope that they can be improved. Despite claiming to derive his law of gravitation by induction from phenomena without resource to hypotheses, Newton does nevertheless acknowledge in the Principia that his rules of reasoning make metaphysical presuppositions. To this extent, Newton has a more enlightened view of scientific method than most 20th and 21st century scientists and historians and philosophers of science.
| Export/Citation: | EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL |
| Social Networking: |
| Item Type: | Published Article or Volume | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creators: |
|
||||||
| Keywords: | Newton, Inductivism, Duhem, Popper, Evidence, Metaphysics, Scientific Method | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science Specific Sciences > Physics General Issues > Theory/Observation |
||||||
| Depositing User: | Nicholas Maxwell | ||||||
| Date Deposited: | 31 Dec 2014 21:56 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 31 Dec 2014 21:56 | ||||||
| Item ID: | 11238 | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Advances in Historical Studies | ||||||
| Official URL: | http://www.scirp.org/journal/ahs | ||||||
| Subjects: | General Issues > History of Philosophy of Science Specific Sciences > Physics General Issues > Theory/Observation |
||||||
| Date: | 2014 | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 2-11 | ||||||
| Volume: | 3 | ||||||
| URI: | https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11238 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Three Criticisms of Newton's Inductive Argument in the Principia. (deposited 24 Aug 2013 14:18)
- Three Criticisms of Newton's Inductive Argument in the Principia. (deposited 31 Dec 2014 21:56) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/style/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}