Näger, Paul M
(2015)
A Stronger Bell Argument for Quantum NonLocality.
[Preprint]

PDF
Naeger_PM_2015_Stronger_Bell_Argument_V4.97.pdf
 Submitted Version
Download (510kB)

Abstract
It is widely accepted that the violation of Bell inequalities excludes local theories of the quantum realm. This paper presents a stronger Bell argument which even forbids certain nonlocal theories. Among these excluded nonlocal theories are those whose only nonlocal connection is a probabilistic (or functional) dependence between the spacelike separated measurement outcomes of EPR/B experiments (a subset of outcome dependent theories). In this way, the new argument shows that the result of the received Bell argument, which requires just any kind of nonlocality, is inappropriately weak. Positively, the remaining nonlocal theories, which can violate Bell inequalities (among them quantum theory), are characterized by the fact that at least one of the measurement outcomes in some sense probabilistically depends both on its local as well as on its distant measurement setting (probabilistic Bell contextuality). Whether an additional dependence between the outcomes holds, is irrelevant for the question whether a certain theory can violate Bell inequalities. This new concept of quantum nonlocality is considerably tighter and more informative than the one following from the usual Bell argument. We prove that (given usual background assumptions) the result of the stronger Bell argument presented here is the strongest possible consequence from the violation of Bell inequalities on a qualitative probabilistic level.
Available Versions of this Item
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)

View Item 