Norton, John D. (2003) A Material Theory of Induction. [Preprint]
This is the latest version of this item.
Microsoft Word (.doc)
Contrary to formal theories of induction, I argue that there are no universal inductive inference schemas. The inductive inferences of science are grounded in matters of fact that hold only in particular domains, so that <I>all inductive inference is local</I>. Some are so localized as to defy familiar characterization. Since inductive inference schemas are underwritten by facts, we can assess and control the inductive risk taken in an induction by investigating the warrant for its underwriting facts. In learning more facts, we extend our inductive reach by supplying more localized inductive inference schemes. Since a material theory no longer separates the factual and schematic parts of an induction, it proves not to be vulnerable to Hume's problem of the justification of induction.
|Export/Citation:||EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL|
|Additional Information:||Submitted to <I>Philosophy of Science</I>|
|Subjects:||General Issues > Confirmation/Induction|
|Depositing User:||John Norton|
|Date Deposited:||04 Jun 2003|
|Last Modified:||07 Oct 2010 15:11|
Available Versions of this Item
A Material Theory of Induction. (deposited 12 Feb 2003)
- A Material Theory of Induction. (deposited 04 Jun 2003) [Currently Displayed]
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years
Actions (login required)