PhilSci Archive

What powers are not

Pechlivanidi, Elina and Psillos, Stathis (2016) What powers are not. [Preprint]

[img] PDF
What_powers_are_not__fin.pdf

Download (3MB)

Abstract

This paper analyses and criticizes the idea that powers are representable as vectors. Mumford and Anjum have recently developed a vector model of powers as part of their account of dispositional causation. The purpose of this model is to represent dispositionality, i.e. a sui generis type of modality introduced by their power-based ontology, as well as to explain various features of their account of causation. In this paper, we criticise both the claim that powers are vectors and the concomitant claim that the composition of causes can be understood as vector addition. We argue that powers cannot be thought of as even analogous to vectors, and that the vector model is simply misleading. We show that the root of the problem is in Mumford and Anjum’s thought that powers have magnitude and direction.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Preprint
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Pechlivanidi, Elina
Psillos, Stathis
Keywords: dispositionality, causation, powers, composition of causes, vectors, vectorial representation
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Depositing User: Stathis Psillos
Date Deposited: 09 May 2016 12:56
Last Modified: 09 May 2016 12:56
Item ID: 12080
Subjects: General Issues > Causation
Date: 9 May 2016
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12080

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item