PhilSci Archive

Anthropomorphism as Cognitive Bias

Dacey, Mike (2016) Anthropomorphism as Cognitive Bias. In: UNSPECIFIED.

[img]
Preview
Text
Anthropomorphism as Cognitive Bias for PSA.pdf

Download (194kB) | Preview

Abstract

Philosophers and psychologists have long worried that a human tendency to anthropomorphize leads us to err in our understanding of nonhuman minds. This tendency, which I call intuitive anthropomorphism, is a heuristic used by our unconscious folk psychology to understand the behavior of nonhuman animals. I argue that the dominant understanding of intuitive anthropomorphism underestimates its complexity. It does often lead us to err, but not always. And the errors it produces are not only overestimations of nonhuman intelligence. If we want to understand and control intuitive anthropomorphism, we must treat is as a cognitive bias, and look to the empirical evidence. The literature on controlling implicit social biases is particularly helpful. That literature suggests that the most common for intuitive anthropomorphism, Morgan’s Canon, should be rejected, while others need supplementation. It also suggests new approaches.


Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Creators:
CreatorsEmailORCID
Dacey, Mike
Keywords: Anthropomorphism, Comparative psychology, Morgan's Canon, Cognitive bias, priming
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Psychology/Psychiatry
Depositing User: Dr. Mike Dacey
Date Deposited: 29 Oct 2016 16:51
Last Modified: 29 Oct 2016 16:51
Item ID: 12548
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Psychology/Psychiatry
Date: 28 October 2016
URI: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12548

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item