PhilSci Archive

Multiple realization and the commensurability of taxonomies

Zerilli, John (2016) Multiple realization and the commensurability of taxonomies. In: UNSPECIFIED.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text

Download (305kB)


The past two decades have witnessed a revival of interest in multiple realization and multiply realized kinds. Bechtel and Mundale’s (1999) illuminating discussion of the subject must no doubt be credited with having generated much of this renewed interest. Among other virtues, their paper expresses what seems to be an important insight about multiple realization: that unless we keep a consistent grain across realized and realizing kinds, claims alleging the multiple realization of psychological kinds are vulnerable to refutation. In this paper I argue that, intuitions notwithstanding, the terms in which their recommendation has been put make it impossible to follow, while also misleadingly insinuating that meeting their desideratum virtually guarantees mind-brain identity. Instead of a matching of grains, what multiple realization really requires is a principled method for adjudicating upon differences between tokens. Shapiro’s (2000) work on multiple realization can be understood as an attempt to adumbrate such a method.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: Multiple realization, neuroscience, autonomy of psychology, intertheoretic reduction
Subjects: General Issues > Reductionism/Holism
Depositing User: Mr John Zerilli
Date Deposited: 17 Dec 2016 16:04
Last Modified: 17 Dec 2016 16:04
Item ID: 12706
Subjects: General Issues > Reductionism/Holism
Date: 2016

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item