PhilSci Archive

Robust Realism for the LIfe Sciences

Eronen, Markus (2017) Robust Realism for the LIfe Sciences. Synthese. ISSN 1573-0964

This is the latest version of this item.

[img] Text
robust realism synth final preprint.pdf

Download (213kB)


Although scientific realism is the default position in the life sciences, philosophical accounts of realism are geared towards physics and run into trouble when applied to fields such as biology or neuroscience. In this paper, I formulate a new robustness-based version of entity realism, and show that it provides a plausible account of realism for the life sciences that is also continuous with scientific practice. It is based on the idea that if there are several independent ways of measuring, detecting or deriving something, then we are justified in believing that it is real. I also consider several possible objections to robustness-based entity realism, discuss its relationship to ontic structural realism, and show how it has the potential to provide a novel response to the pessimistic induction argument.

Export/Citation: EndNote | BibTeX | Dublin Core | ASCII/Text Citation (Chicago) | HTML Citation | OpenURL
Social Networking:
Share |

Item Type: Published Article or Volume
Eronen, Markus
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Depositing User: Dr. Markus Eronen
Date Deposited: 20 Aug 2017 16:27
Last Modified: 20 Aug 2017 16:27
Item ID: 13343
Journal or Publication Title: Synthese
Publisher: Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Subjects: Specific Sciences > Biology
General Issues > Realism/Anti-realism
Date: 2017
ISSN: 1573-0964

Available Versions of this Item

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Monthly Downloads for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item